INTRODUCTION
The bare facts of the life and
career of the author of the work here translated may be summarized in a few sentences;
more extended biographies are not far to seek, and for the English-reading public A.
Schimmel’s Gabriel’s Wing, Iqbal Singh’s The Passionate Pilgrim,
and S. A. Vahid’s Iqbal, his Art and Thought, contain a wealth of detail and
interpretation sufficient to satisfy the most exacting curiosity.
Muhammad Iqbal was born on
February 22, 1873, at Sialkot, a populous centre of West Punjab near the borders of Jammu,
of a family hailing originally from Kashmir. In 1895 he moved to Lahore to complete his
formal studies, and there began to write. In 1905 on the advice of Sir Thomas Arnold, at
that time teaching in Government College, he proceeded to England and for three years at
Trinity College, Cambridge he applied his great energies chiefly to philosophy under
McTaggart. Graduating from Cambridge in 1908, Iqbal qualified for the Bar in London and
did post-graduate work in Germany before returning to India to teach in Lahore and to
practise law; later he resigned his appointment at Government College and concentrated on
his legal and political work. In 1924. he became a member of the Legislative Assembly of
his native province, and in 1930 he was elected President of the Moslem League of India;
meanwhile in 1922 a knighthood had been conferred upon him. Taking part in the London
Round-Table Conference on India in 1931-32, he spent 1933 in Afghanistan as adviser on
education. In 1934 his health began to decline, and on April 21, 1938, he died.
Throughout his extremely active
life, in which he did so much to shape the destinies of the land of his birth and to mould
the political future of the Moslem community (so that he has been called the spiritual
founder of Pakistan), Iqbal maintained a steady and, towards the end, a torrential output
of literature. Writing with equal facility in Urdu, Persian and English, and in his
soaring range covering law, philosophy and religion as well as politics, it was as a poet
that Iqbal made his greatest contribution to letters. On his death Rabindranath Tagore
wrote: "The deatlh of Sir Muhammad Iqbal creates a void in literature that like a
mortal wound will take a very long time to heal. India, whose place in the world is too
narrow, can ill afford to miss a poet whose poetry had such universal value."
Iqbal’s first publication, in 1901, was a treatise on economics in Urdu, the earliest
to appear in that language; his last, issued posthumously under the title Armughan-i-Hijaz
(‘Present from Hijaz’), contained his final collection of Persian and Urdu
poems. The volume here translated, the Javid Namah, came out in 1932.
‘Iqbal’s magnum
opus’, writes his biographer S. A. Vahid, ‘is the Javid Namah. Within a
few years of its publication the poem became a classic, and. one great scholar proclaimed
that the poem will rank with Firdausi’s Shah Namah, Rumi’s Mathnawi,
Sa‘di’s Gulistan and the Diwan of Hafiz. Nor was this tribute an
exaggeration, as subsequent criticism showed ... In judging a poem we have to consider two
things: the style and the substance. So far as the style is concerned, Javid Namah
belongs to the very first rank of Persian verse. It is unsurpassed in grandeur of
expression, in beauty of diction and in richness of illustration. As regards theme, the
poem deals with the everlasting conflict of the soul, and by telling the story of human
struggle against sin, shows to mankind the path to glory and peace. In every line the poet
makes us feel that he has something to say that is not only worth saying, but is also
fitted to give us pleasure. Thus, as regards style as well as theme the poem is a
masterpiece.’
The Javid-nama, having
been frequently reissued in lithograph – the edition on which the present translation
is based was published in 1946 at Hyderabad (Deccan) – was first translated, into
Italian, by Professor Alessandro Bausani under the title II Poema Celeste (Rome,
1952). A version in German verse, Buch der Ewigkeit (Munich, 1957), has come from
the pen of Professor Annemarie Schimmel. A French version, by E. Meyerovitch and Mohammed
Mokri, has the title Le Livre de l’�ternit� (Paris, 1962). In 1961 a
translation in English verse was published in Lahore, The Pilgrimage of Eternity by
Shaikh Mahmud Ahmad. The poem has thus reached a truly international public, and has
already taken its rightful place amongst the modern classics of world literature.
Iqbal composed three long Persian
poems in which he gave artistic expression to his highly characteristic philosophical
ideas. The first of these, the Asrar-i Khudi, was published in 1915 and ‘on
its first appearance took by storm the younger generation of Indian Moslems.
"Iqbal," wrote one of them, "has come amongst us as a Messiah and has
stirred the dead into life."’ So wrote R. A. Nicholson, whose prose version of
this work, The Secrets of the Self (Macmillan, 1920), first introduced Iqbal’s
writings to the western public. The second of the trilogy, the Rumuz-i Bekhudi came
out in 1918, but it was not until 1953 that the first translation appeared, an English
blank-verse rendering by the present writer entitled The Mysteries of Selflessness
(John Murray).
As their titles indicate, the
central theme of both these poems is the Self, or human ego, in its relationship to
society, more specifically the Moslem community, and the place of the Moslem community in
the world at large. In common with all sensitive Moslems in India and elsewhere, Iqbal was
deeply pained by the contrast between Islam in the days of its greatest power, and the
status of colonial tutelage – to use a mild euphemism – to which most Moslem
countries had sunk in modern times. He saw the only hope of reversing the process of
decline to reside in the regeneration of every individual Moslem, and the working together
of these regenerated individuals in a united and purposeful Community of Believers, in
God’s good time coextensive with the whole of humanity. ‘Thus the Kingdom of God
on earth’, Iqbal wrote in a famous letter to R. A. Nicholson, ‘means the
democracy of more or less unique individuals, presided over by the most unique individual
possible on this earth.’ For a developed philosophical exposition of his doctrine of
the Self, in its maturest form, the reader is recommended to consult Iqbal’s Reconstruction
of Religious Thought in Islam (O.U.P., 1934), and especially chapter IV, ‘The
Human Ego – his freedmon and in mortality’.
Both the Asrar-i Khudi and
the Rumuz-i Bekhudi were composed in rhyming couplets, following a very long
tradition in Persian didactic poetry going back a thousand years. The metre chosen by
Iqbal for these poems is the ramal-i musaddas-i maqsur, the same as that employed
by the greatest of Persian mystics, Jalal al-Din Rumi (1207-1273), in the greatest
didactic poem in Persian literature, the Masnavi. I have summarized the early
history of this verse-form in the preface to my Tales from the Masnavi (Allen &
Unwin, 1961), which the reader may wish to consult. One noteworthy feature of the
convention is that the poet lightens from time to time the weight of formal exposition by
the introduction of illustrative anecdotes; to this tradition Iqbal also conformed. When,
however, he came to compose the third of his trilogy, Iqbal varied the pattern strikingly;
the Javid-nama is conceived as a narrative poem, or rather, a poetic drama, in
which the didactic is put into the mouths of the dramatis personae. A further
remarkable novelty is the interspersing of lyrics, in various metres and in the mono-rhyme
characteristic of the Persian ghazal, the effect of which is a very great enhancement of
the poetic tension of the whole.
The Javid-nama is a
description of a spiritual journey made by the poet, from earth through the
‘spheres’ of the Moon, Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn, to beyond the
‘spheres’ and to the Presence of God. The antecedents of this heavenly adventure
go back, within Islamic tradition, to the celebrated mi‘raj of the Prophet Mohammed,
that famous legend of his Ascension the germs of which are to be traced in the Koran. In
his journey through the seven heavens Mohammed, mounted upon the winged horse Buraq, had
as his guide the archangel Gabriel; in the course of his ascent he is said to have
encountered and conversed with earlier prophets, from Adam in the first heaven to Abraham
in the seventh, before enjoying the supreme felicity of colloquy with God. The
Prophet’s mi‘raj naturally formed a theme of meditation and – as part of
the imitatio Prophetae – of emulation for many pious Moslems and mystics through the
succeeding centuries, and so Iqbal did not lack for precedents and models when he came to
adopt this very popular vehicle for the final expression of his doctrine of Moslem
regeneration and self-realization. He nominated as his guide the poet to whose language,
style and thought he felt himself rightly to be under a special obligation, the Sage of
Rum, Jalal al-Din Rumi; whilst the personalities he encountered on his journey were drawn
not from the hierarchy of the prophets, but from those who had played a leading part in
the history of Islam, particularly in its later period.
Iqbal presents the translator
with all the usual problems connected with translating poetry, and with further problems,
still more difficult of solution, posed by his elusive style and idiosyncratic vocabulary.
That this elusiveness was deliberate is proved by a remark he jotted down in a notebook
dating from 1910, and published by his son Javid in 1961 : ‘Matthew Arnold is a very
precise poet. I like, however, an element of obscurity and vagueness in poetry; since the
vague and the obscure appear profound to the emotions.’ In choosing Persian as the
medium for conveying his universal message, Iqbal was not adding materially to the
difficulties of interpretation; rather the contrary, for Persian had been preferred by
Indian Moslem poets for centuries over the local idioms, Persian being the court language
of the Moghul Empire. (The rise of Urdu, and the consequent decline of the knowledge of
Persian, in fact happened during Iqbal’s lifetime; his own genius did very much to
enhance its status and mature its style.) But Persian is a language almost ideally suited
to deliberate vagueness, on account both of its grammatical and syntactical simplicity,
and of its rich and at the same time somewhat imprecise philosophical vocabulary. Or
rather, imprecision is not the crux of the matter; the case is, that the terms available
for was are capable of a variety of meanings, and Iqbal, like every original thinker, not
infrequently attached to quite simple words and clich�s his own private signification.
This last point has been well
made by S. A. Vahid in his Iqbal, his Art and Thought. ‘The remarkable point
about Iqbal’s poetry is the sense of "newness", and the main reason for
this is that although Iqbal was not actually anti-traditionalist, he uses certain words
and combination of words to express his visions which are entirely original. Some of these
words are coined by him; others represent old words used in an entirely new sense ... He
is also a superb phrase-maker and has wonderful felicity of phrasing by which language
acquires meanings beyond those formally assigned by the lexicographer. These words and
phrases act as the keystone for the entire arch of the poetic inspiration. As the removal
of the keystone is sure to cause the downfall of the entire arch, so if we try to
substitute something else for the master word or phrase, the whole artistic expression is
marred. The use of those words and phrases give to Iqbal’s poetry not only a sense of
"newness" found in very few Urdu and Persian poets, but also the quality of
surprise which characterises all great poetry.’
It has been said that the ideal
at which the translator should aim is to produce a version as near as possible to what his
original would have written, had he been composing in the translator’s language and
not his own. It so happens that in the case of the Javid-nama, we have been
provided with material, though all too scanty, enabling us to test this theory; in his Reconstruction
of Religious Thought, Iqbal has himself translated into English two passages from this
poem. The first of these passages represents verses 2733-2736, which in Iqbal’s own
version become:
The ‘I am’ which he seeketh,
Lieth beyond philosophy, beyond knowledge.
The plant which groweth only from the invisible soil of
the heart of man,
Groweth not from a mere heap of clay.
In the original Persian these
lines read:
khvast ta az ab u gil ayad birun
khusha-yi k-az kisht-i dil ayad birun
anchi u juyad maqam-i kibriya-st
in maqam az ‘aql u hikmat ma-vara-st
The poet thus not only reversed
the original order of the two couplets, but also changed the tense of the main clause,
itself in apposition to the immediately preceding sentence and having the same verbal
construction, from the past to the present; nor, as will be seen, were these the only
liberties he took with himself – liberties which would surely be condemned in any
ordinary translator.
Iqbal’s second self-
translation is more extensive, representing lines 239 to 266 of the Javid-nama.
Art thou in the stage of ‘Life’, ‘death’, or ‘death- in- life’?
Invoke the aid of three witnesses to verify thy ‘Station’.
The first witness is thine own consciousness–
See thyself, then, with thine own light.
The second witness is the consciousness of another ego–
See thyself, then, with the light of an ego other than thee.
The third witness is God’s consciousness–
See thyself, then, with God’s light.
If thou standest unshaken in front of this light,
Consider thyself as living and eternal as He !
That man alone is real who dares—
Dares to see God face to face!
What is ‘Ascension’? Only a search for a witness
Who may finally confirm thy reality—
A witness whose confirmation alone makes thee eternal.
No one can stand unshaken in His Presence;
And he who can, verily, he is pure gold.
Art thou a mere particle of dust?
Tighten the knot of thy ego;
And hold fast to thy tiny being!
How glorious to burnish one’s ego
And to test its lustre in the presence of the Sun!
Re-chisel, then, thine ancient frame;
And build up a new being.
Such being is real being;
Or else thy ego is a mere ring of smoke!
The foregoing passage affords a
very fair example of how close and how remote Iqbal was prepared to make his own version
of himself; for comparison, in addition to the translation offered in the present volume,
the reader may like to consider the verse–paraphrase by Shaikh Mahmud Ahmad.
Art thou alive or dead or dying fast?
Three witnesses should testify thy state.
The first as witness is the consciousness
Of self, to see thyself by thy own light.
The second is another’s consciousness
That thou may’st kindle thus to see thyself.
And thy third witness is God’s consciousness,
A light in which thou may’st see thyself.
Before the Lord’s effulgence if thou stand’st
Thou art alive like Him. For life is but
To reach thy destined end, that is to see
The Lord unveiled. One who believes
Shall never lose himself in Attributes
For Mustafa insisted on the Sight.
The night to heaven means a longing for
A witness who may testify thyself.
Unless it be confirmed by Him, our life
Is nothing but a play of tint and smell.
No one can stand against His beauty bright,
Except the one who has perfection reached.
O grain of sand! thy lustre do not lose,
Thy ego’s knot but tighten up. Thy gleam
Increase, then test thyself against the sun,
If thou canst thus reshape thyself and pass
The test, thou art alive and praised or else
The fire of life is smoke and naught beside.
Other specimens of English
versions of selected passages from the Javid-nama may be inspected in the general
literature, by now extensive, which has developed out of studies of Iqbal. As for the
translation here offered, the aim has been to adhere as closely as possible to the meaning
of the original Persian; passages not immediately comprehensible, by reason of
out-of-the-way references or otherwise, have been clarified in brief notes. Appended to
the Persian text is an ‘Address to Javid’, the poet’s son after whom the
poem was named: this appendix does not form part of the whole work, and the present
translator has followed the example of his predecessors and has omitted it.
0 comments:
Post a Comment